|
Post by Kyle on Jul 26, 2007 23:15:12 GMT -5
hey guys, im changing all the computers on the website to intel, and im having trouble deciding between these two processors, they are exactly the same, the only thing different is the L2 cache and clock speed, the E2160 has a 1mb L2 cache and clocked at 1.8ghz, E4400 is 2mb L2 cache clocked at 2.0 ghz
im wondering if its worth the extra money E2160: $95 E4400: $126
i can easily oc that E2160 to 2.0ghz stable, its a very stable core, they both use the Allendale core, so they are basically the exact same processor except for cache, little help?
this is for an office pc, btw
thanks, kyle
|
|
|
Post by mattiedashark83 on Jul 26, 2007 23:22:09 GMT -5
I'd say go for the E4400. I'm not sure what overall market your trying to capture but people see higher clock speeds and want them. Plus 2mb Cache is better than 1mb Cache.
Will you be custom over clocking systems for clients?
|
|
|
Post by Kyle on Jul 27, 2007 4:01:16 GMT -5
thanks, thats what i went with
ya thats the plan, every one of our computers mid-performance and up will come overclocked from us and our overclocking is covered by warranty, saves the client money instead of buying more expensive parts
|
|
|
Post by Juice on Jul 28, 2007 19:26:37 GMT -5
I say, go for the E4400.
|
|
|
Post by Kyle on Jul 28, 2007 21:58:37 GMT -5
ya i did, thanks guys
|
|